|
Some of Britain’s leading scientists have today, Wednesday, appealed to food & environment minister, Hilary Benn, to stand firm against proposed EU legislation to limit the availability of a wide range of agrochemical products used in the production of cereals, fruit and vegetables.
In an open letter to the Minister, 7 leading scientists in the field have criticised the EU Commission’s proposals, which would severely impact on Europe’s ability to produce food, as being based on politics and not science. The scientists include the heads of some of the UK's world class plant and agricultural science institutions including Rothamsted Research, the John Innes Centre and North Wyke Research Centre.
“At a time of international food shortages the proposal will have a devastating effect on farming and food production in the UK and across Europe. To introduce such measures in the midst of this crisis is an international scandal and must be resisted. There is no evidence of public health benefit to justify these proposals,” said Dr. Colin Ruscoe of the British Crop Production Council, organisers of the letter.
“The heads of publicly-funded world class agriculture science institutions in the UK have come together to sound the alarm and call for the UK government to challenge the scientific basis for these draconian regulations and to put their commitment to evidence-based policy into practice,” he added.
The Directive was approved by the Council of EU Agriculture Ministers at the end of last month. It now goes to the EU parliament, which has called for even tighter controls to be imposed.
“The UK government voted against the proposals and we applaud them for that - but it now needs to do everything it can to ensure that British MEP’s also oppose the measure,” added Dr. Ruscoe.
“The proposal will move pesticide regulation to a hazard-based regime in which “cut offs” are politically determined. The existing very stringent European process for regulation of agrochemicals is based on a scientific approach, assessing both the intrinsic hazard of the chemical and exposure in practice to ensure negligible risk – and then applying large safety margins to reduce it still further.”
|